Uno de los elementos base para proteger el secreto comercial (o empresarial...) es que sea reconocible como tal, como bien protegido, con definiciones y medidas en el ámbito en el cual se lo aplica y se pacta confidencialidad en torno a él.
Esta afirmación resulta verídica o verificable en cada ocasión que hay algún tipo de juicio o conflicto en el que terceros lo deben evaluar.
Dejó link a "The IP Law Blog" que hace referencia al respecto.
"One of the first elements that a plaintiff must prove to succeed on a trade secret claim is that it is the owner of a valid trade secret. To do so, the law generally imposes a burden on plaintiffs to identify its trade secrets with sufficient particularity in order to succeed. As the Ninth Circuit recently recognized, this burden allows courts and litigants to navigate “the line between the protection of unique, innovative technologies and vigorous competition.” In InteliClear, LLC v. ETC Global Holdings, Inc. (decided October 15, 2020), the Ninth Circuit addressed the issue of whether a plaintiff had satisfied the “sufficient particularity” burden and whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to a defendant when its motion was filed after just one day of discovery."
https://www.theiplawblog.com/2020/11/articles/ip/trade-secrets-and-the-duty-to-identify-them-with-sufficient-particularity/
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario